the guidon online

Filed under Opinion

Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

Back to Article
Back to Article

Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Hate speech should not be protected by the First Amendment.

The definition of “hate speech” by the Merriam-Webster dictionary is speech expressing hatred of a particular group of people.

Many say that hate speech, although extremely racist or homophobic, is protected by the First Amendment.

However, inciting violence is not protected by the First Amendment.

For example, an anti-abortion website was sued for publishing information about abortion doctors and their families. Although it did not directly state threats, website readers displayed violent behavior toward the doctors. The website was found guilty of inciting violence.

This means that even if no direct threat is made, it can still promote violence. Hate speech usually does not directly threaten people of a certain race, but it can cause people to take initiative and turn to violence.

For example, hate speech can talk about how certain races are dangerous. This can cause people to seek a way to defend themselves. Then, the next time someone of a different race comes around, they can become defensive and pull out a weapon.

If people feel they are in danger, they could also try to get the upper hand and attack someone before someone “attacks” them.

Overall, hate speech can cause paranoia and stereotyping, two things that cause people to act irrationally.

21kboyle@usd489.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About the Writer
Kalyssa Boyle, Staff Reporter

Kalyssa Boyle is a sophomore who loves gaming, Mountain Dew, and snakes. Her hair color varies and is mostly decided by whatever box has the most ridiculous...

Leave a Comment

The Guidon intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Guidon does not allow anonymous comments, and The Guidon requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Left
  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Nov. 26 should have been snow day

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Not voting should not be shameful

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Teachers shouldn’t give homework to students

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Gun rights should be honored in America

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Freewill is an illusion

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Edge superior to other browsers

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Board of Education should not purchase Chromebooks for next school year

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Global warming evidence hard to ignore

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    25-minute lunches should be commonplace

  • Hate speech not protected by First Amendment

    Opinion

    Pressure to choose career stressful for teenagers

Navigate Right
The School Newspaper of Hays High School
Hate speech not protected by First Amendment